Dehumanized
"...a fanatical monster, as cold-blooded, unswerving, unmerciful and terrible as a thug of India..." New York Ledger (1865)
In the first accounts that came out after the rebellion, Nat Turner became a figure to be reviled as a “monster,” a conclusion often drawn after vivid descriptions of the carnage. Dehumanizing Turner was one way to explain one of the mysteries of the rebellion: why had the rebels spared neither women nor children? Such dehumanized portrayals of Turner were resurrected sporadically in the decades that followed as a way to counter abolitionist championing of him. Turner was not always a monster in these depictions, however; in one instance, he is a sly fox, evading capture.